COPE Retraction Guidelines (Aug 2025): "The purpose of retraction is to correct the literature and ensure its integrity, not to punish the authors"
Quote (Committee on Publication Ethics retraction guidelines, August 2025 update):
"The purpose of retraction is to correct the literature and ensure its integrity, not to punish the authors."
Source: https://publicationethics.org
Confidence: Verified.
Why this framing matters for business writing: A correction without a process change is theater. A retraction stigmatized as failure produces under-disclosure. The COPE framing — corrections exist to fix the record, not punish — is the right disposition to import into Candid editorial process.
Used as the framing for the CANDID REFERENCE: retraction/correction playbook — 4 magnitudes from typo to fundamental retraction (adapted from COPE) (in this brief) — Candid's 4-magnitude retraction discipline (typo / substantive / material / fundamentally wrong) explicitly adopts the COPE framing.
Referenced by (3)
- reference CANDID REFERENCE: retraction/correction playbook — 4 magnitudes from typo to fundamental retraction (adapted from COPE) depends-on
- rule RULE: Publish a public corrections log + retraction policy. A correction without a process change is theater. depends-on
- reference Research brief: Confidence Levels, Sources, and Dated Claims — why every statement on a credible site should be verifiable (piece 15 of 15) relates-to