Reference entries (21)
- referenceCANDID REFERENCE: how the 15-brief foundation roadmap connects — the throughline from strategic frame to editorial layer
- referenceCANDID REFERENCE: retraction/correction playbook — 4 magnitudes from typo to fundamental retraction (adapted from COPE)
- referenceCANDID REFERENCE: "what to source" checklist — Must / Should / Doesn't need
- referenceCANDID REFERENCE: 8-pattern citation library — inline links, hover footnotes, end-of-section, archive pairs, schema
- referenceCANDID REFERENCE: 7-label confidence taxonomy — Verified / Industry-consensus / Single-source / Estimated / Author's view / Contested / Stale
- referenceCOPE Retraction Guidelines (Aug 2025): "The purpose of retraction is to correct the literature and ensure its integrity, not to punish the authors"
- referenceUS Intelligence Community: high/moderate/low confidence taxonomy (ICD 203/206, 2007 NIE Iran convention)
- referenceWikipedia: "The threshold for inclusion is verifiability, not truth" — four claim types always need inline citations
- referenceSPJ Code of Ethics (2014): "Identify sources clearly. The public is entitled to as much information as possible to judge reliability and motivations"
- referenceReuters Handbook of Journalism: "A named source is always preferable to an unnamed source. Anonymous sources are the weakest sources"
- referenceBBC Editorial Guidelines §3.2.2: "All BBC output...must be well sourced, based on sound evidence, thoroughly tested"
- referenceResearch brief: Confidence Levels, Sources, and Dated Claims — why every statement on a credible site should be verifiable (piece 15 of 15)
- referenceReference: research-first tooling stack 2026 — Obsidian + Git + Quartz/Astro + AI overlay (RAG)
- referenceReference: 8 named exemplars of research-first/docs-as-product methodology — Stripe, Twilio, Anthropic, Gwern, Matuschak, Appleton, BAM, Construction Physics
- referenceReference: research-first cadence by operation type — 1 piece/month to bimonthly print
- referenceReference framework: audience layering — foundation research vs public article vs marketing page (3-column comparison)
- referenceReference framework: Research-first workflow — 5 stages (Capture → Foundation → Synthesis → Article → Marketing page → Maintain)
- referenceDevon Zuegel: epistemic-status labels are "a hack in order to publish half-baked ideas I'd otherwise not feel comfortable sharing"
- referenceHubSpot 2015 (n=13,500+): companies posting 16+ blog posts/month got "almost 3.5× more inbound traffic" — dated but still cited
- referenceCasey Newton / Platformer retreat from daily cadence (April 2026): "More scoops, less aggregation and analysis" — AI commoditizes daily synthesis
- referenceResearch brief: Research Before Pages — methodology for KB-backed websites (piece 14 of 15)
