Google WebP Compression Study: WebP is 25-34% smaller than JPEG at equivalent SSIM (avg ~30%)
Created 2026-05-22
Claim: Per Google's WebP Compression Study (updated August 7, 2025), WebP is 25-34% smaller than JPEG at equivalent SSIM index. Google's own FAQ summarises this as "an average of 30% more compression than JPEG."
Source: https://developers.google.com/speed/webp/docs/webp_study
Confidence: Verified (Google primary).
Practical implication: Modern image formats (WebP, AVIF) are the lowest-effort, highest-yield CWV improvement available. AVIF is even better than WebP for some image classes (20-50% smaller than JPEG depending on content). Use <picture> with AVIF + WebP + JPEG fallback for broad browser support.
Referenced by (3)
- reference Reference: the 8 most common LCP killers — ranked by observed frequency depends-on
- rule RULE: The LCP image always has explicit width/height + fetchpriority="high" + no lazy-loading depends-on
- reference Research brief: Page Speed as a Moat — why CWV separates the agencies from the freelancers (piece 9 of 15) relates-to