Seer Interactive (53 brands, 5.47M queries, 2.43B impressions) — brand-cited pages earn ~120% more clicks per impression than uncited; ~38% behind no-AIO pages; explicit causal caveat
Summary
Claim: Seer Interactive (53 brands, 5.47M queries, 2.43B impressions, Jan 2025 – Feb 2026) found brand-cited pages earn ~120% more clicks per impression than uncited pages on the same AI Overview SERPs — though still ~38% behind no-AIO pages.
Source: seerinteractive.com — Apr 2026.
Confidence: Single-source (agency study).
Caveat — Seer's explicit causal caveat: they cannot prove citation causes higher CTR rather than authoritative brands simply being cited more often. Correlation, not proven causation.
Why this matters for Candid: Important framing data — being cited carries measurable value (the +120% figure), and the overall SERP environment is worse for clicks (the -38% bound). Both halves matter. Honest framing in client conversations: "earning citation recovers most but not all of the lost click rate."
Related entries
Referenced by (3)
- reference Research brief: the website as a working surface of the business — four capabilities, AI-citation decoupling, freshness as a real signal (June 2026) relates-to
- reference Caveats for the working-surface brief: independent anchors (Pew, peer-reviewed GEO paper, Ahrefs large-N) carry the load; vendor figures are range / corroboration, not independent confirmation relates-to
- rule R5 — Decouple from Google rank as sole success metric; AI citation, AI-Mode mentions, and direct-traffic / branded search now matter independently depends-on