De Keyzer et al. (2025), Journal of Advertising — meta-analysis: actual personalization outperforms imagined / scenario personalization via stronger self-referencing and perceived relevance

Summary

Claim: De Keyzer et al. (2025), Journal of Advertising meta-analysis: actual personalization outperforms imagined / scenario personalization via stronger self-referencing and perceived relevance.

Source: De Keyzer et al. (2025), Journal of Advertising.

Confidence: Verified (meta-analysis).

Caveat: Personalization can trigger privacy concern; evidence suggests relevance's pull on attention typically exceeds the privacy drag for relevant, non-creepy use.

Why this matters for Candid: Single sharpest finding in the brief. A calculator's output is ACTUAL personalization (computed from real user input), which the meta-analysis says is the more effective kind. Closes the loop from psychology → measured outcomes in advertising contexts.