McCurdy et al. (2020), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review — 126-article / 310-experiment meta: generation effect magnitude depends on "generation constraint" (how constrained the produced response is)
Created 2026-06-20
Summary
Claim: McCurdy et al. (2020), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review — meta-analysis of 126 articles, 310 experiments. Effect magnitude depends on "generation constraint" — how constrained the produced response is.
Source: McCurdy et al. (2020), Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
Confidence: Verified (meta-analysis).
Why this matters for Candid: Settles the design dial — the more constrained the user's input (single-choice dropdown vs free-text), the smaller the generation benefit. Free-text inputs where appropriate beat dropdown selections on engagement; balance against form-friction (Practitioner claim: single-field forms ~30-40% conversion, seven-field forms ~5-15% — A/B observation, not controlled study from Brief A).
Related entries
Referenced by (2)
- research-notes Research notes (capture-layer top-up): why interactive online tools are psychologically engaging — six additional mechanisms (June 2026) relates-to
- rule R4 — Where appropriate, make the user GENERATE inputs (not just pick from menus) — the generation effect d≈0.40 is real but ceilings beyond ~900 words and doesn't scale to expository text depends-on