Reference entries (33)
- reference B&J technical SEO posture — old vs new, with explicit gaps to close pre-launch
- reference B&J — five structural craft signals worth surfacing in case-study narrative (v2)
- reference B&J — Lighthouse status (v2): NOT measurable from production host; needs a desktop DevTools session
- reference B&J — image and asset inventory (v2, verified 2026-05-24)
- reference B&J — deploy frequency and commit cadence (v2, verified 2026-05-24)
- reference B&J — service uptime, memory footprint, and tunnel reachability (v2, verified 2026-05-24)
- reference B&J — JSON-LD schema deployment VERIFIED (v2) — supersedes the "biggest technical gap" claim in v1
- reference B&J — lubricants module shape (v2): 81 records in a TS module, deliberately lift-and-shift-ready for the Manifold swap
- reference B&J — database state (v2, verified 2026-05-24) — marketing site is materially read-only
- reference B&J — build performance (v2, Turbopack, verified 2026-05-24)
- reference B&J — repo and codebase facts (v2, verified 2026-05-24)
- reference Boucher & Jones — case-study source material, v2 (technical facts, 2026-05-24)
- reference B&J — known unknowns that need a human conversation or a tool query before publication
- reference B&J — source documents in the project knowledge base (so the KB knows what is and is not ingested here)
- reference B&J case study — suggested narrative angles, ranked, with a recommended hybrid lead
- reference B&J case study — critical overclaim guards (READ BEFORE WRITING)
- reference B&J case study — visual assets needed, confidentiality unknowns, method appendix
- reference B&J quotes — what is available verbatim, what still needs to be gathered
- roadmap-item B&J roadmap — what is next (Phase 2 marketing site, CRM phases 1-3, Manifold Phase 3)
- reference B&J — what was hard (for the "what surprised us" section)
- reference B&J architectural decisions worth surfacing in case-study narrative — eight, ranked
- reference B&J KPI candidates — every defensible metric, with source and confidence
- reference B&J content quality — what the pre-launch audit explicitly called out as strong
- reference B&J live site inventory — page count, IA, what is planned (headline KPI: ~50 pages live vs ~6 before)
- reference B&J positioning — "walk with quiet confidence" (editorial discipline, NOT a public tagline)
- decision-record B&J architectural decision: custom platform vs Manage Petro / PDI / Cargas — why custom won
- decision-record B&J data model — first-class entities, including TANKS (the most quotable architecture decision)
- reference Manifold data platform — Candid Creative product powering embedded widgets on the B&J site
- reference B&J CRM platform — PLANNED stack (not yet built)
- reference B&J marketing site stack (`bj-next`, dev URL `bjweb.candidcreative.ca`) — VERIFIED LIVE STACK
- reference B&J engagement — active workstreams, status, and Candid services rendered
- reference B&J customer profile — legal entity, sub-brands, verticals, geography, sites, leadership
- reference Boucher & Jones Fuels — case-study source material, v1 (parent index)
