HomeStars Inc. BBB profile snapshot May 2026: D- rating, 35 unanswered complaints, 32 closed in 3 years, customer reviews 1.06/5 across 16 reviews; principal Chari Estevez, Operations Director

Current BBB profile snapshot for HomeStars Inc., 49 Spadina Ave, Suite 200, Toronto, as of May 2026:

Metric Value
BBB rating D- (driven by "Failure to respond to 35 complaint(s) filed against business")
BBB Accredited No
Customer reviews 1.06 / 5 average across 16 reviews
Complaints last 3 years 32
Complaints last 12 months 16
Principal Chari Estevez, Operations Director

Source: BBB.org (HomeStars Inc. profile), accessed May 2026. Confidence: Verified.

Supplements the existing pattern entry HomeStars BBB profile (Canada): pattern of fake leads, billing after cancellation, reviews held to subscription status with the current May 2026 letter-grade snapshot.

Five recurring complaint themes (highly consistent across complainants)

  1. "Dead leads" — unresponsive homeowners, 2am job postings, phone numbers that go to voicemail.
  2. Charged-without-job — contractors invoiced for shortlisting or contact-button clicks that produced no work.
  3. Refund-system failures — contractors flagged for "dishonest refund requests" and account-suspended for disputing.
  4. Collections escalation — disputed invoices ($10–$2,000) referred to debt collectors during active disputes.
  5. Trapped reviews — contractors who leave HomeStars find their existing reviews hard to surface, while the profile remains live and searchable as "no longer with HomeStars."

Why the D- specifically matters

BBB rating methodology weighs failure to respond to complaints very heavily. A D- driven by 35 unanswered complaints is not a "few bad reviews" pattern — it is a pattern of the company declining to engage with the BBB process at all. For Candid client copy, this is a defensible single data point: "HomeStars itself carries a D- BBB rating driven by 35 unanswered complaints" — verifiable in one click on bbb.org.

Pair with the FTC settlement (FTC v. HomeAdvisor (Angi) settlement: $7.2M for redress, deceptive lead-marketing prohibition, final order April 2023; 110,372 refund checks to service providers from Nov 2023; Competition Bureau Canada has NOT taken parallel action) as the U.S. regulatory action for a fuller picture.