HCRA Code of Ethics (O. Reg. 245/21) in force July 1, 2021 — Discipline Committee max fines $50K individual / $100K corporation
Created 2026-05-24
Claim: HCRA's Code of Ethics is O. Reg. 245/21, in force July 1, 2021. The Discipline Committee may fine licensees up to $50,000 (individuals) and $100,000 (corporations).
Sources:
- O. Reg. 245/21: https://www.ontario.ca/laws/regulation/210245
- Discipline Committee: https://www.hcraontario.ca/discipline-appeals-committee/
Confidence: Verified.
Key sections to know:
- Section 3 — fair, honest, integrity-based dealing.
- Section 6 — conscientious and competent conduct.
- Section 8 — "conduct unbecoming"; credible allegations can support discipline even without a conviction.
- Section 17 — advertising must be accurate (see HCRA Code of Ethics s.17 requires accurate advertising; superlatives ("best", "safest") without substantiation are a discipline risk for the Candid-actionable version).
Discipline track caveat: the Discipline Committee process can collapse if HCRA does not assemble sufficient buyer evidence — see Briarwood Development Group — largest Discipline Committee case ($32M+) DISMISSED in 2025; credibility hit for HCRA discipline track. Flag this any time discipline is cited as the enforcement teeth.
Referenced by (6)
- reference Research brief: Ontario Home Construction Regulatory Authority (HCRA) — definitive reference (May 2026) relates-to
- reference Adi Development / Nautique (Burlington) — first major HCRA Notice of Proposal; November 2022 LAT settlement: $60K AMP + $2,585,674.58 to 141 purchasers relates-to
- reference GC King Bond GP Inc. — $16M in AMPs for 76 Code of Ethics breaches (July 2024); $1.1M reimbursed; receivership June 2025 relates-to
- reference Pinetree Developments Inc. (Mississauga) — licence revoked June 2023; first revocation explicitly tied to price-gouging relates-to
- reference Briarwood Development Group — largest Discipline Committee case ($32M+) DISMISSED in 2025; credibility hit for HCRA discipline track relates-to
- rule HCRA Code of Ethics s.17 requires accurate advertising; superlatives ("best", "safest") without substantiation are a discipline risk depends-on